When most people think of oil, they think of the liquid which shoots out of the ground when the drill reaches it. But this is only part of the oil resource, known as conventional oil. There are other types of oil known by many names such as unconventional oil, heavy oil, tar sands, oil shale, bitumen, etc. Some of these oils exist in vast amounts, greater than the remaining conventional oil, but unfortunately they are not the answer to our needs. Oil Shale
Kenneth Deffeyes from "Hubbert's Peak" There is certainly no shortage of oil shales – it is estimated that the world has over 1600 Gb of oil available, 1200 Gb of which lies in the USA. Other countries with oil shale include Canada, Australia, Estonia, Germany and Israel. With conventional oil reserves estimated at 900 Gb, it would seem to be the answer to our prayers. Unfortunately oil shale carries serious disadvantages. First, most of it needs to be dug out in strip mining rather that drilled, a process that has high environmental problems. Once dug out, it then needs to be heated to 450-500°C, enriched with hydrogen via steam before the resulting oil is separated. We are then left with a sludge which has increased in volume by 30% through the process and needs to be disposed of. The downsides of all this are that oil shale production creates more than four times as much greenhouse gases as conventional oil production, it uses vast quantities of water (which are not always available where the shale is), and wastes something like 40% of its initial energy in production. Oil shale production is expensive, wasteful and environmentally hazardous. It is only now, when conventional oil prices are high, that oil shale production has become feasible. It will no doubt make a contribution to the oil shortfall in the future but it is no panacea. Tar Sands
Kenneth Deffeyes from "Hubbert's Peak" Tar sands (often now called by the more attractive sounding 'oil sands') consists of a combination of sand and clay with bitumen. It exists in even greater quantities than oil shale, about one third (1,800 Gb) in Venezuela (Orinoco), one third (1,700 Gb) in Canada (Athabasca) and the rest mainly in the Middle East. Unfortunately, like oil shale, it also carries a heavy burden. The tar sands in Canada generally lie deep and have to be produced by damaging strip mining. Hot water is added to the result, piped to a plant and then agitated before the oil is skimmed off. What this process needs are vast amounts of water, an abundance of energy to boil that water, and plenty of space for the waste. The first two are becoming in serious short supply in Canada. To produce a single barrel of oil means digging out four tonnes of materials and leaves you with 80 kg of greenhouse gases and 3-5 barrels of waste water as well as the sand residue. It consumes two to five barrels of fresh water, 250 cubic feet of natural gas to mine and 500 cubic feet of gas to upgrade to synthetic crude oil. This gas is enough to heat a Canadian home for 4.5 days. The tar sands industry consumes about 0.6 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily, enough to heat 3.2 million Canadian homes each day. The result also totally destroys the forests and bogs there. Although in great supply, tar sands face even greater problems than oil shales in their production. It is unlikely that the rate of production from them will make much of a dent in the oil depletion problem. The present output from Canada is one million barrels per day; this at a time when world consumption is over 80 mbpd. It is claimed that output could reach 5 mbpd in 2030 but, with demand rising and conventional oil declining, the contribution would be minimal. Like oil shales, tar sands could be compared to drinking water from a barrel through a straw – there is plenty there but if a hundred people are waiting to drink, some are going to get mighty thirsty. : Natural Gas : Coal : Nuclear : Renewables : Hydrogen |
|
|
|
|
|
|